Al-Razi University Journal for Medical Sciences http://rujms.alraziuni.edu.ye/index.php/rzjournal <p>&nbsp;</p> <p>The Collage of Medical Science in corporation with the Scientific Research Center- Al-Razi University publish a new high-quality journal devoted to Medical sciences:</p> <p><strong>Al-Razi University Journal of Medical Sciences</strong></p> <p>The Editorial Board is very committed to build the Journal as one of the leading international journals in Medical sciences in the next few years. With the support of the Scientific Research Center -Al-Razi University, it is expected that a heavy resource to be channeled into the Journal to establish its international reputation. The first issue of the journal appears in early 2017 with two issues per year.</p> <p><strong><u><span lang="AR-SA">Aims and Scope</span></u></strong></p> <p>The Al-Razi University Journal of Medical Sciences (RUJMS) is a scientific, bi-annual, peer-reviewed publication that will focus on current topics of interest to the Medical community at large. The RUJMS aims to provide a forum for a broad blend of scientific and technical papers to reflect the evolving needs of the Medical sciences. The RUJMS welcomes the submission of a manuscript that meets the general criteria of significance and academic excellence. All articles published in JJBS are peer-reviewed.</p> <p><strong>Chief- in-editor: Prof. Nabil Ahmed Al-Rabeei2</strong></p> <p>Email:&nbsp;nabil_alrabeei@alraziuni.edu.ye</p> <h3 class="LC20lb DKV0Md"><strong><span dir="ltr">Managing editor: Assoc. Prof. Mohammed Sadeg Al-Awar</span></strong></h3> <p><span dir="ltr">Email.momed.sadeg@gmail.com</span></p> <p><strong>Full Journal Title&nbsp;</strong>:</p> <p>Al-Razi University Journal for Medical Sciences (RUJMS)</p> <p><strong>Organization</strong>&nbsp;:</p> <p>College of medical sciences, Al-Razi University ,Sana'a, Yemen</p> <p><strong>Publisher</strong>&nbsp;:</p> <p>Research Center- Al-Razi University</p> <p><strong>Aim &amp; Scope:</strong></p> <p>Al-Razi University Journal for Medical Sciences (RUJMS) is the official journal of Al-Razi University, which is published quarterly. RUJMS is an open access online and a peer-reviewed journal, which is aimed to serve as scientific research journal related to medical and health sciences. The emphasis will be on publishing quality papers rapidly and freely available to researchers worldwide.</p> <p><strong>Publishing Approval</strong>&nbsp;:</p> <p>Approved by the Ministry of Higher Education and Scientific Research in the ministerial decree No. (57) for the year 2018 within the approved journals for the purposes of scientific research and the adoption of published research for scientific promotion</p> <p><strong>Scientific Research Approval :</strong></p> <p>The Yemen committee of medical science journals of ministry of health and population according to certificate on 2016 as scientific research medical journal.</p> <p><strong>Content Coverage :</strong></p> <p>RUJMS is an authoritative clinical source which its content is devoted to particular compilation of the latest worldwide and interdisciplinary approach and findings including original articles, meta-analyses, case report and review articles, and letters in all areas of medical and health sciences (medicine, nursing, public health, community medicine, pharmacy, medical laboratory, anesthesia, physiotherapy, midwifery). The emphasis will be on publishing quality papers rapidly and freely available to researchers worldwide.</p> <p><strong>Abbreviation Title :</strong></p> <p>Al-Razi Un. J. Med Sci.</p> <p><strong>Category :</strong></p> <p>Medical and health sciences.</p> <p><strong>Language :</strong></p> <p>English</p> <p><strong>Journal Country:</strong></p> <p>Yemen</p> <p><strong>Frequency:</strong></p> <p>Quarterly</p> <p><strong>Online Submission:</strong></p> <p><a href="http://alraziuni.edu.ye/rujms/">http://alraziuni.edu.ye/rujms/</a></p> <p><strong>Review Process :</strong></p> <p>All manuscripts will experience an extensive single-blind peer-review process.</p> <p>&nbsp;</p> <p>Copy right of articles published in the RUJMS belong to the Al-Razi University- unless the work is subject to copyright. It is the responsibility of the author (s) to advise the Editor in Chief of any circumstances affecting the transfer of copyright or involving conflict of interest.</p> <h3>Section Policies</h3> <h4>Articles</h4> <table width="84%"> <tbody> <tr> <td width="30%"> <p>&nbsp;Open Submissions</p> </td> <td width="24%"> <p>&nbsp;Indexed</p> </td> <td width="43%"> <p>&nbsp;Peer Reviewed</p> </td> </tr> </tbody> </table> <h3>Peer Review Process</h3> <p>Articles submitted are reviewed according to highest standard by scientists specialized in their fields. The research must not have been published or offered for publication elsewhere, and the author must present a pledge to this effect.</p> <p>Open Access Policy</p> <p>This journal provides immediate open access to its content on the principle that making research freely available to the public supports a greater global exchange of knowledge.</p> <p><strong>Indexing/ Abstracting</strong></p> <ul> <li class="show"><strong> Ulrich's Periodicals Directory</strong></li> <li class="show"><strong> Google Scholar</strong></li> <li class="show"><strong> EBSCO</strong></li> </ul> <p><strong>Malpractice and Ethics Statement</strong></p> <p><strong>General</strong></p> <ul> <li class="show">RUJMS is committed to publishing original high quality scholarly research papers that provide solid insights into all aspects of Medical Sciences.</li> <li class="show">As a scientific refereed journal, RUJMS follows a standard process of a stringent double-blind review process. Significant guidelines are provided to reviewers so as to ensure high value and original publications.</li> <li class="show">A RUJMS Transfer of Copyright form that each author must sign to acknowledge that the paper is original, is not submitted elsewhere, and does not include copyrighted elements.</li> <li class="show">In case of plagiarism, misuse of published articles, and/or illegal distribution of research papers are proven, RUJMS is very aggressive in the legal actions it takes so as to prevent such unethical action.</li> </ul> <p><strong>Duties of Editors</strong></p> <p>&nbsp;</p> <ul> <li class="show">Determine whether a submitted manuscript is appropriate and within the scope of the Journal.</li> <li class="show">Select expert reviewers (i.e., referees) and an area editor to evaluate the submitted manuscript.</li> <li class="show">Render a final editorial decision on each manuscript based on journal priorities, other similar manuscripts in process and related considerations.</li> <li class="show">Communicate directly with the author and the review team.</li> <li class="show">Schedule accepted manuscripts for publication.</li> <li class="show">Balance workloads for the area editors and reviewers.</li> <li class="show">Resolve any conflicts.</li> </ul> <p>Fair Play:The editors should evaluate manuscripts for their intellectual content without regard to race, gender, sexual orientation, religious belief, ethnic origin, citizenship, or political philosophy of the authors.</p> <p>Confidentiality: The editors and any editorial staff must not disclose any information about a submitted manuscript to anyone other than the corresponding author, reviewers, potential reviewers, other editorial advisers, and the publisher, as appropriate.</p> <p>Disclosure and conflicts of interest: Unpublished materials disclosed in a submitted manuscript must not be used in an editor's own research without the express written consent of the author. Privileged information or ideas obtained through peer review must be kept confidential and not used for personal advantage.</p> <p>Involvement and cooperation in investigations: The editors should take reasonably responsive measures when ethical complaints have been presented concerning a submitted manuscript or published paper.</p> <p><strong>Duties of Reviewers</strong><br> <br> <strong>Contribution to editorial decisions:&nbsp;</strong>Peer review assists the editor in making editorial decisions and through the editorial communications with the author may also assist the author in improving the paper. Peer review is an essential component of formal scholarly communication, and lies at the heart of the scientific method.<br> <br> <strong>Promptness:</strong>Any selected referee who feels unqualified to review the research reported in a manuscript or knows that its prompt review will be impossible should notify the editor and excuse himself from the review process.<br> <br> <strong>Confidentiality:&nbsp;</strong>Any manuscripts received for review must be treated as confidential documents. They must not be shown to or discussed with others except as authorized by the editor.<br> <br> <strong>Standards of objectivity:</strong>&nbsp;Reviews should be conducted objectively. Personal criticism of the author is inappropriate. Referees should express their views clearly with supporting arguments.<br> <br> <strong>Acknowledgement of sources:&nbsp;</strong>Reviewers should identify relevant published work that has not been cited by the authors. Any statement that an observation, derivation, or argument had been previously reported should be accompanied by the relevant citation. A reviewer should also call to the editor's attention any substantial similarity or overlap between the manuscript under consideration and any other published paper of which they have personal knowledge.<br> <br> <strong>Disclosure and conflict of interest:&nbsp;</strong>Unpublished materials disclosed in a submitted manuscript must not be used in a reviewer’s own research without the express written consent of the author.</p> <p><strong>Duties of Authors</strong><br> <br> <strong>Reporting standards:</strong>Authors of reports of original research should present an accurate account of the work performed as well as an objective discussion of its significance. A paper should contain sufficient detail and references to permit others to replicate the work.<br> <br> <strong>Data access and retention:&nbsp;</strong>Authors may be asked to provide the raw data in connection with a paper for editorial review.<br> <br> <strong>Originality and plagiarism:</strong>&nbsp;The authors should ensure that they have written entirely original works, and if the authors have used the work or words of others that this has been appropriately cited or quoted.<br> <br> <strong>Multiple, redundant or concurrent publication:</strong>An author should not in general publish manuscripts describing essentially the same research in more than one journal or primary publication.<br> <br> <strong>Acknowledgement of sources:</strong>&nbsp;Proper acknowledgment of the work of others must always be given. Information obtained in the course of confidential services, such as refereeing manuscripts or grant applications, must not be used without the explicit written permission of the author of the work involved in these services.<br> <br> <strong>Authorship of the paper:</strong>&nbsp;Authorship should be limited to those who have made a significant contribution to the conception, design, execution, or interpretation of the reported study. All those who have made significant contributions should be listed as co-authors. Where there are others who have participated in certain substantive aspects of the research project, they should be acknowledged or listed as contributors.<br> <br> <strong>Disclosure and conflicts of interest:&nbsp;</strong>All authors should disclose in their manuscript any financial or other substantive conflict of interest that might be construed to influence the results or interpretation of their manuscript. All sources of financial support for the project should be disclosed.<br> <br> <strong>Fundamental errors in published works:</strong>&nbsp;When an author discovers a significant error or inaccuracy in his/her own published work, it is the author’s obligation to promptly notify the journal editor and cooperate with the editor to retract or correct the paper.<br> <br> <strong>Duties of the Editorial Board</strong><br> <br> Editorial boards are essential and valuable resource for journals to publications because they make sure that journals are published with integrity and accuracy. These boards often include the publisher, editor-in-chief, assistant editor, advertising editor and department editors. Editorial boards of Journal are responsible for deciding which of the articles submitted to the journal should be published.</p> <p><strong>ETHICS</strong><br>The RUJMS insists on ethical practices in both human and animal experiments. Evidence of approval by a local Ethics Committee must be supplied by the authors on demand. Animal experimental procedures should be as humane as possible and the details of anesthetics and analgesics used should be clearly stated. The ethical standards of experiments must be in accordance with The Code of Ethics of the World Medical Association (Declaration of Helsinki) for experiments involving humans and EU Directive 2010/63/EU for animal experiments. The journal will not consider any paper which is ethically unacceptable. A statement on ethics committee permission and ethical practices must be included in all research articles under the ‘Materials and Methods’ section. Uniform Requirements for manuscripts submitted to Biomedical Journals must be observed.</p> <p><strong>Address:</strong></p> <p>College of Medical Sciences - Al-RaziUniversity</p> <p>Telefax: 406760</p> <p>Al-Rabat St - Sana'a – Yemen</p> Al-Razi University en-US Al-Razi University Journal for Medical Sciences 2708-0870 Investigating Caralluma penicillata's Medicinal Properties: Effects on Haematological Parameters and Renal Functions in Cotton Pellet Induced Granuloma in Adult Guinea Pigs http://rujms.alraziuni.edu.ye/index.php/rzjournal/article/view/172 <p><strong>Background</strong>: <em>Caralluma penicillata</em> is a plant that possessing a great therapeutic potential in Yemeni folk medicines, such as antipyretic, antirheumatic, for the treatment of peptic ulcer and antihyperglycemic. <strong>Aim</strong>: The study was conducted to determine the impact of <em>C. penicillata</em> on a few haematological variables and tow aspects of renal functioning in cotton pellet-induced granuloma in adult male guinea pigs. <strong>Method</strong>: Thirty six guinea pigs were assigned randomly to six groups (I, II, III, IV, V and VI), each with six guinea pigs. Group (I) A normal control group got 5% Polysorbate 80 in dosages similar to those of the drugs. Group (II) Normal saline in an equivalent dosage was given to the untreated control group. Groups (III-VI) got tested drugs either singly or in combinations. <strong>Results</strong>: According to the findings, <em>C. penicillata</em> extract did not appear to reduce the increases in total leukocytic count, haematocrit value, or erythrocytic sedimentation rate. An increase in neutrophils, monocytes, and eosinophils was seen, along with a noticeably less number of lymphocytic cells. An increase in plasma urea and creatinine indicated a significant deterioration in renal functioning, according to the data. This nephrotoxic effect was unaffected by <em>C. penicillata</em> extract or indomethacin, either alone or in combination. <strong>Conclusion</strong>: The <em>C. penicillata</em> extract was unable to reverse the hematological or nephrotoxic consequences of cotton pellet-induced granuloma.</p> Nabil Ahmed Albaser Mohammed Amood AL-Kamarany ##submission.copyrightStatement## 2023-08-27 2023-08-27 7 2 1 7 10.51610/rujms7.2.2023.172 Knowledge of Patients with Acute Myocardial Infarction toward Cardiovascular Risk Factors in Public Hospitals at Sana'a-Yemen http://rujms.alraziuni.edu.ye/index.php/rzjournal/article/view/173 <p><strong>Background:</strong> Globally, cardiovascular disease (CVD) poses a significant public health challenge. Evidence indicates that individuals with CVD have considerable knowledge gaps about cardiovascular risk factors. The aim of the study was to assess the knowledge of patients with acute myocardial infarction toward cardiovascular risk factors. <strong>Method:</strong> A descriptive cross-sectional study. Convenance sampling technique from January to March 30, 2023. The data was collected by using a closed-ended questionnaire with demographic data, medical history, and patients’ knowledge regarding different risk factors at a public hospital in Sana'a, Yemen<strong>. Results:</strong> A total of 178 patients were enrolled in the study. The mean age was 60.98 years, and 77.5% of patients were male. 53.9% of them live in rural areas, while 28.65% of patients are illiterate. Most patients had hypertension, and 51.1% of patients had a family history of diseases. The main risk factors for the occurrence of myocardial infarction are smoking (90.4%), hyperlipidemia (72.5%), and high blood pressure (61.2%). Overall knowledge of cardiovascular risk factors among patients was fair (52.2%), and 32.0% of them had poor knowledge, while 15.7% of patients had good knowledge. Age and educational level were significantly associated with knowledge of cardiovascular risk factors. <strong>Conclusions:</strong> Patients with myocardial infarction have a fair knowledge of the cardiovascular risk factors. We recommended that medical and nursing staff play a crucial role in this teaching process, and they should be encouraged to educate patients when providing health services regarding the development and progression of disease, predisposing factors, and prevention methods.</p> Abdulnasser Ahmed Haza’a Marzoq Odhaha Saddam Al-Ahdala Fawz Mohammed Abol–Gaith Nada Ahmed Ismail Abdulfatah Saleh Al-Jaradi Bandar Al-haguri Mohammed Aljabri Fuad Abduallah Al-Magamey ##submission.copyrightStatement## 2023-08-27 2023-08-27 7 2 8 15 10.51610/rujms7.2.2023.173 Risk Factors of Urinary Tract Stones Formation: A Case – Control Study in Ibn Sina Hospital Sana’a city, Yemen http://rujms.alraziuni.edu.ye/index.php/rzjournal/article/view/174 <p><strong>Background</strong>: Renal stone is a distressing chronic condition that is becoming common across the world. However, apparently, the main risk factors responsible for the occurrence of renal stones in Yemen have not been investigated yet. <strong>Objective</strong>: To find out the main risk factors responsible for the occurrence of renal stones in Ibn Sina hospital patients in Sanaa City Yemen. <strong>Method</strong>: A case-control study was conducted among 181 (63 cases and 126 controls) individuals attending the outpatient departments of Ibn Sina Hospital in Sana’a City Yemen during the period of December 2020 and August 2021.&nbsp; <strong>Results</strong>: The age mean of cases was 41.98 ±10.5 years, while the age mean of controls was 36.4±10 years. The current study found associations of occurrence of renal stone with genetic predisposition (odd ratio (OR): 11.9, 95% confidence intervale (CI); 5.66-25.17), walking &lt; 1 hr/day (OR: 5.8, 95% CI; 1.87-18.47), water consumption &lt; one bottle/day and one bottle/ day (OR: 7.7 and 4, 95% CI; 1.72-34.44 and 1.02-15.76 respectively), drinking mineral water (OR: 0.2, 95% CI; 0.066-0.59), daily dairy consumption (OR: 15.5, 95% CI; 4.122-58.7), weekly cattle meat consumption (OR: 2.7, 95% CI; 1.34-5.38), both daily and weekly consumption of fresh fruits (OR: 0.02 and 0.004, 95% CI;&nbsp; 0.001-0.37 and 0.000-.095 respectively), and both weekly consumption of other vegetables and legumes (OR: 0.3 and 0.2, 95% CI; 0.100-0.95 and 0.074-0.57 respectively). <strong>Conclusions</strong>: The current study recommended that greater attention to renal stone classification, approaches to assessing the risk of recurrence and individualized prevention strategies may improve the clinical care of stone formers. Lifestyle changes help to reduce renal stone disease formation.</p> Maged Ali Yahya AL-Ghashmi Fawz Mohammed Abol–Gaith ##submission.copyrightStatement## 2023-08-28 2023-08-28 7 2 10.51610/rujms7.2.2023.174 Knowledge and Practice of Intensive Care Nurses Towards Weaning Criteria From Mechanical Ventilation at Public Hospitals in Sana'a City-Yemen http://rujms.alraziuni.edu.ye/index.php/rzjournal/article/view/175 <p><strong>Methods</strong>: A descriptive, cross-sectional study was carried out at a public hospitals in Sana’a City-Yemen among ICU nurses. The sample size was 93 Yemeni nurses. A stratified random sampling was applied. Data were collected by using a close-ended questionnaire to testing knowledge and observational checklist to testing nurses practice. A pilot study was conducted and validity and reliability of the questionnaire was also tested. The data were analyzed using SPSS and measured using frequency and percent for categorical variables and Means and SD for quantitative variable. t-test was used to determine the differences between two variables and one-way ANOVA determine the differences between more than two variables. Chi-squaire test was used to determine the relationship between variables. A P-value &lt; 0.05 was considered statistically significant.<strong>Results: </strong>The results showed that (54%) of the nurses had correct knowledge toward WC from MV whereas (46%) of them had incorrect knowledge. While (39%) of nurses had poor knowledge, and (50%) of them had moderate knowledge and (11%) of them had good knowledge, While (46%) of the nurses were correctly practiced to WC from MV, whereas (44%) of them were not done and (10%) need correctly practiced. As regards to level of practice, (49%) had poor practice, (36%) had a moderate practice and (15%) had a good practice. There was no significant differences in the mean knowledge scores toward WC by demographic characteristics of nurses (P&gt;0.05). A significant differences in the mean knowledge scores toward WC according to diploma degree in respiratory therapy was found (P&lt;0.05) but not for course training in WC and courses training in ICU (P&gt;0.05).&nbsp; A statistically significant differences was found in mean practice scores toward WC from MV by demographic characteristics of nurses (P&lt;0.05) but not for sex (P&gt;0.05). A statistically significant differences was found in mean practice scores toward WC from MV by diploma degree in respiratory therapy, course training in WC and courses training in ICU (P&lt; 0.05). <strong>Conclusion:</strong> This study conclude that (50%) of the nurses had moderate knowledge toward WC from MV and (36%) of them had moderate practice, This study recommended increasing knowledge and practice of ICU nurses through the courses training and implementation WC and protocol weaning in all ICU units.</p> Abdullateef Ahmed AL-Gunaid Nabil Ahmed Al-Rabeei Sadek A. Al-Wesaby ##submission.copyrightStatement## 2023-09-19 2023-09-19 7 2 10.51610/rujms7.2.2023.175 Acupuncture for stroke http://rujms.alraziuni.edu.ye/index.php/rzjournal/article/view/188 <p>Stroke is one of the most common cause of death especially for elderly people. The main symptom of stroke is weakness in one side of the body. During rehabilitation, patient may suffer some complications such as shoulder pain, insomnia, dysphagia, or muscle spasm. Acupuncture is widely used in china and east Asian countries for stroke rehabilitation. Many researchers studied the effect of acupuncture on stroke rehabilitation and complications prevention and treatment. Acupuncture showed positive effect on stroke rehabilitation combined with exercise. Acupuncture also showed effects on brain blood flow, dysphagia, insomnia, muscle spasticity and shoulder pain. The effect of acupuncture may vary based on what technique is used and practitioner experience. On this paper, the author reviewed many systemic reviews on the effect of acupuncture for stroke rehabilitation.</p> Osamah Ezzaddin ##submission.copyrightStatement## 2023-11-15 2023-11-15 7 2 10.51610/rujms7.2.2023.188 The Patients Misuse of Antibiotics and Perception of Antibiotic Resistance Sana'a City-Yemen http://rujms.alraziuni.edu.ye/index.php/rzjournal/article/view/195 <p><strong>Background of the study: </strong>Misuse of antibiotic in both healthcare setting and the community through poor prescribing practices and consumer behaviour have contributed enormously to the acquired antibiotic resistance (ABR) which presents a significant threat to public health globally in the 21st century. <strong>Objective: </strong>To assess the antibiotics misuse and perception of resistance among patients in different health care facilities in Sana'a City. <strong>Methods</strong>: A descriptive cross-sectional study of 384 adult patient's public hospitals in Sana'a City, between February and June 2021 was used. A multistage cluster random sampling was used; Five districts were selected randomly and the public, private hospitals. The sample was approached a questionnaire (face–to–face interview), The sample responded to size was determined using Epi info. The instrument is a questionnaire for patients. The data was analyzed using (SPSS) program version 26.0. Frequencies, T-test, one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA), binary logistic and ordinal logistic regression were used. Informed written consent was obtained from all participants in the study. <strong>Results: </strong>Only 4.4% of patients have good knowledge of antibiotics, 40% had not heard about antibiotic resistance, two-thirds of patients do not consult a physician before taking antibiotics, 72% did not complete the antibiotic course and 67% of patients taking antibiotics within the past six months. &nbsp;<strong>Conclusion: </strong>Patient's showed inadequate knowledge and perception towards the ant antibiotics and their resistance. They have poor practice about using antibiotics.</p> Shawqi Shugaa Aldeen Fawz M Abol-Gaith ##submission.copyrightStatement## 2023-11-15 2023-11-15 7 2 10.51610/rujms7.2.2023.195 Prevalence of Hepatitis B Surface Antigen, Hepatitis B Core Antibody and Hepatitis C Antibody among Blood Donors at National Blood Transfusion &Research Center in Sana'a City. http://rujms.alraziuni.edu.ye/index.php/rzjournal/article/view/194 <p>Infection with hepatitis B virus (HBV) and hepatitis C virus (HCV) is major global health problem; the transfusion and product of blood are recognized risk factors of acquiring HBV and HCV. <strong>Objective:</strong>&nbsp; To determine the prevalence of Hepatitis B Surface Antigen, Hepatitis B Core Antibody and Hepatitis C Antibody among blood donors at National Blood Transfusion &amp; Research Center in Sana'a City. <strong>Results:</strong>&nbsp; from a total of 5000 blood donor participated in the present study tested for HBsAg, HBcAb and HCV only 130 (2.6%), 507 (10.1) and 53(1.6%) was found to be positive for HBsAg, HBcAb and HCV Ab respectively There was a statistically significant difference between HBcAB &amp; HBsAg with <strong><em>p</em></strong><em>= </em>0.001 and between age groups and antihepatitice Bc with <em>p</em>=0.04. There was no statistically significant difference between jobs and antihepatitice Bc with <em>p</em>= 0.4, no difference between jobs and hepatitis C with <em>p</em>=0.3, no difference between jobs and hepatitis B sAg with <em>p</em>=0.7, no difference between age groups and Hepatitis BsAg and Hepatitis C Ab with <em>p</em>=0.09 and <em>p</em>=0.7 respectively.&nbsp;&nbsp;<strong>Conclusion.</strong> Hepatitis B surface antigen and Hepatitis B cor Ab should be tested as A diagnosis test for hepatitis B virus. Health education should concern risk factors and prevention of HBV and HCV infections for public.</p> Safwan Mahmood Qasam ##submission.copyrightStatement## 2023-11-15 2023-11-15 7 2 10.51610/rujms7.2.2023.194